Mass UFO Sighting New York (analysis)

[UFOphotos]

Mass UFO Sighting New York (analysis)

This video is a short analysis of two groups of objects seen in the raw exclusive CBS footage from october 13, 2010, showing a fleet of mysterious glowing orbs / spheres hovering and floating over New York City. There were something very odd going on in the skies over New York that day, and we got it all on video. This is one of the more odd UFO sightings, with both balloons and real UFOs in the same airspace, same day same place. I think we can dismiss the theory about weatherballoons, because FAA spokesman Jim Peters told us, that if the objects were weather balloons, “his agency had no prior notification they’d be launched”. But ordinary balloons, both party- and corporate balloons were released different places in New York city that day, so we got balloons in the airspace too, that´s for sure. Some of the unidentified flying objects caught by CBS cameras, WAS balloons, BUT NOT ALL OBJECTS in the sky was partyballoons that day.

My blogpost about the New York UFO Sighting + reference links here and here

[Fin]

I think its clear from some of the vids and this analysis that SOME of the objects were NOT balloons.  Nuff said.

[UFOphotos]

I think it´s clear that UFO´s was in the sky over New York. I have great difficulties to see what can dismiss that theory - we got a fixed triangle formation over a city with warm upwinds, that have to disturb a fixed formation like this, if it was balloons. Well, after listening to the junkmusic I made in the first video, I created a second but shorter video analysis of the New York UFO sighting, with much better audio and a nice illustration, enjoy:

UFO Sighting New York October 2010

[Mike]

May be they are alien craft, but I'm not convinced and this still proves absolutely nothing. It also strikes me as somewhat pretentious to refer to this as an "analysis", in my opinion. 

[Crickinneck]

May be they are alien craft, but I'm not convinced and this still proves absolutely nothing. It also strikes me as somewhat pretentious to refer to this as an "analysis", in my opinion. 

Is he on here just to promote his site's i wonder?

[Fin]

yeah if this is like the other "analysis" vid it is not actually an ANALYSIS.. it would be better labelled "highlights with zooming".